Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakelika Presents: Another Cult Classic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 20:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Pakelika Presents: Another Cult Classic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable album by non-notable artist (whose article was deleted via AfD) with little or no media coverage and no references. Fails WP:MUSIC#Albums and WP:V. Prod removed without comment. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 21:18, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 21:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If the artist isn't notable, than neither are their albums. The All Music Guide link isn't quite enough to satisfy WP:RS either. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:MUSIC. --Sharkface217 02:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's not encyclopedic enough. Dwilso 05:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, if the band is not notable, then the records probably are not either. This doesn't appear to be an exception. Fails WP:MUSIC notability criteria. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.